Re: Gdk-pixbuf 0.20.0 is released
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: Tomasz K?oczko <kloczek rudy mif pg gda pl>
- Cc: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>, gnome-list gnome org, gnome-hackers gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gdk-pixbuf 0.20.0 is released
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 11:12:25 +1000
<quote who="Tomasz K?oczko">
> Sacalabilities with keep in mind minimal anount of changes will be much
> better. Why not use:
>
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/<project> for latest version
>
> and:
>
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/stable/sources/<project>/archive
'stable' was used in the old system -> having a single directory for each
GNOME release. root-level version directories didn't scale, because we have
lots of different GNOME releases and categories.
> ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/archive/sources/<project>/
>
> for store all archiv tar balls ?
That's what the complete sources/ directory does. Mirrors can choose to
exclude it, and sync their mirrors with link dereferencing.
> In both cases will even simplify mirroring only latest resources by ommit
> (olny) one directory or ommit directories by regexp. I can undestand why
> it was performed but IMHO "implementation" sill isn't optimal/best
> possible.
As I said before, we're considering adding latest/ symlink trees, it's just
a matter of finding the best spot/structure for them.
- Jeff
--
"Not only that, but Google is fast. In fact, it's quite competitive
with DNS." - Raph Levien
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]