Re: EggDateTime status
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Sebastian Rittau <srittau jroger in-berlin de>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org, jrb redhat com, andersca gnu org
- Subject: Re: EggDateTime status
- Date: 30 Sep 2002 15:25:45 -0400
Sebastian Rittau <srittau jroger in-berlin de> writes:
> I agree completely. My original plan stated to include this into GTK,
> and - if that is not possible or not wanted - to include it into
> libgnomeui. But since I got no feedback from gtk-devel, I targetted it
> for libgnomeui for now. I can try to convince Owen that this is a
> worthwhile addition to GTK, though.
Yep. Well, essentially if it's a general-purpose, mature widget we
expect lots of apps to use, then it makes sense in GTK+. If it isn't a
general-purpose widget we expect apps to use, then it doesn't belong
in libgnomeui either - libgnomeui shouldn't be the "not good enough
for GTK" dumping ground. ;-)
What do Evolution, Gnumeric, and other apps like that use for this
sort of widget, by the way? I think meeting their needs would be
important.
> P.S. Anyone know who I should write to to get on the white list for this
> mailing list? It's frustrating to wait for the delay until my mail
> is approved.
The white list is:
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/post-only/
(at least I think that works)
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]