Re: Proposal for inclusion of Straw in the Gnome CVS
- From: Juri Pakaste <juri iki fi>
- To: Christian Rose <menthos menthos com>
- Cc: Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>, GNOME Hackers <gnome-hackers gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Proposal for inclusion of Straw in the Gnome CVS
- Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:26:49 +0200
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 01:33, Christian Rose wrote:
> tis 2003-12-09 klockan 00.04 skrev Mikael Hallendal:
> > Hmm ,, just saw in Juri's blog that he intented to make the GNOME CVS
> > module a read only one, with the main repo in arch. Then I don't see any
> > point in having it in GNOME CVS.
> >
> > The main benefits of having it in GNOME CVS is imho to have the
> > translators being able to work directly against the CVS and to have
> > others that want to contribute being able to work against the same CVS
> > as they are already working (and having accounts).
> >
> > Having it in Arch and sync it every know and then doesn't seem to give
> > much compared to having people that want to try it out using the
> > tarballs instead.
>
> If Juri is prepared to manually sync all changes made in CVS with his
> arch repository¹, then I don't see why not. Having the full source
> available in GNOME CVS definately helps translators.
Yeah, sorry for the unclear wording. The idea is to sync changes back
from CVS too.
> ¹ Although personally, I must admit I cannot understand why anyone would
> go through this amount of pain with syncing with cvs to be able to keep
> the master source in arch. I guess arch must be really good to be worth
> it...
Well, someone has to do it, otherwise we'll be stuck with CVS forever
:-)
--
[ Juri Pakaste / juri iki fi / http://www.iki.fi/juri/ ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]