Re: glade code generation

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:43:26AM +1300, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> 	I've just had to explain for the umpteenth time to people to use
> libglade instead of code generation ... Surely if we're not recommending
> that anyone use it, we should just remove it completely to avoid the
> confusion ?
> 

No one wants to touch glade though, or they might be mistaken for the
new maintainer of it. ;-) 

(I agree with the change, fwiw.)

Havoc