RE: glade code generation

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

> From: Mark McLoughlin [mailto:mark skynet ie] 
> 	I've just had to explain for the umpteenth time to 
> people to use libglade instead of code generation ... Surely 
> if we're not recommending that anyone use it, we should just 
> remove it completely to avoid the confusion ?

It's worth noting that though the generation of C code is quite useless, the
generation of C++ code via glademm is apparently fairly sensible. I'm told
that it generates sensible code and expects all user modifications to be
made in separate derived classes that are untouched by future regenerations.
So, we might not want to completely remove the ability to generated code.

Glademm is not to be confused with libglademm.

Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com