El mié, 12 de 03 de 2003 a las 19:52, Joe Shaw escribió: > On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 13:10, Luis Villa wrote: > > I know some people have discussed this, but the current system works, > > and until someone comes up with the resources and manpower to convert us > > (as well as persuade everyone it's a good idea) I'm guessing the current > > admin team isn't going to be anxious to take on that burden. > > I don't think it's necessarily a good idea to migrate everything over to > subversion, but I think it'd be good to, once svn 1.0 is out, set up a > repository alongside the CVS repo. New modules could use subversion and > if maintainers wanted to move their modules over, that'd be fine too. > Yes, It sounds like the right solution for me. > Of course, this is conditional on someone actually going ahead and doing > the work, and be willing to maintain it. :) I will work with subversion and also I have a GNOME's CVS mirror in my server (for i18n tasks) so I will be playing with it. I don't think I could maintain it, but I could prepare scripts or show other people how they should do the migration.. Cheers. > > Joe > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-hackers mailing list > gnome-hackers gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers -- Carlos Perelló Marín mailto:carlos gnome-db org mailto:carlos perello hispalinux es http://www.gnome-db.org http://www.Hispalinux.es Valencia - Spain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente