Re: GNOME CVS: librsvg doml
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Malcolm Tredinnick <malcolm commsecure com au>
- Cc: gnome-hackers gnome org, <cinamod hotmail com>
- Subject: Re: GNOME CVS: librsvg doml
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 04:16:36 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Malcolm Tredinnick wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 08:28:41PM -0500, Gnome CVS User wrote:
> > CVSROOT: /cvs/gnome
> > Module name: librsvg
> > Changes by: doml 03/03/18 20:28:40
> >
> > Modified files:
> > . : rsvg-styles.c
> > gdk-pixbuf-loader: Makefile.am
> > gimp-plugin : Makefile.am
> > gtk-engine : Makefile.am
> >
> > Log message:
> > bunch of croco-related fixes
>
> I've been meaning to ask if I am the only Nervous Nellie here. By
> default, librsvg now links with libgsf and libcroco if they are present.
> However, that changes the resulting library from librsvg's LGPL to GPL
> for any derived code.
>
> This seems like a bit of a license trap to me; is it better turning the
> gsf and croco dependencies off by default?
I didn't know libcroco was GPL. Yeah, it sounds a bit dangerous to me. We
typically want core libs to be LGPL. This change means no core lib can
depend on librsvg and librsvg can't be a core lib.
Maybe there is a way to affect the libcroco maintainers to relicense to
LGPL? libgsf has already been relicensed.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Alexander Larsson Red Hat, Inc
alexl redhat com alla lysator liu se
He's a bookish drug-addicted rock star on his last day in the job. She's a
violent kleptomaniac barmaid trying to make a difference in a man's world.
They fight crime!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]