Re: Session Management Proposal
- From: George <jirka 5z com>
- To: Ray Strode <halfline hawaii rr com>
- Cc: "Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow taliesin ca>, Mark Finlay <sisob tuxfamily org>, xdg-list freedesktop org, gnome-hackers gnome org, hp redhat com, mark skynet ie, ettrich kde org
- Subject: Re: Session Management Proposal
- Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 09:55:19 -0800
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 06:16:48PM -1000, Ray Strode wrote:
> Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
>
> > Why should such a user not be able to shutdown the computer? Imagine
> > a setup of computer labs. Those machines should always be running. In
> > our setup for example a machine that has been shut down would stop
> > responding to mon inquiries and so look like a machine requiring
> > administrator attention causing a system administrator to be
> > dispatched. Since the physical button are not accessible to users,
> > that machine would in fact be out of usage until the administrator
> > reboots it.
>
> That's another reasonable case where users shouldn't be able to halt
> machines. This case shouldn't be an issue on the session manager side
> of things, either, however, because the session manager is going to
> leave rebooting/halting the machine up to the desktop manager (and if there
> is no desktop manager then maybe use consolehelper).
Yes, and you already have to turn it off in the desktop manager if you don't
want rebooting/shutting down or whatnot ...
Come to think of it, if there IS a desktop manager and it disallows
shutdown/reboot, we shouldn't fall back to consolehelper even if possible,
I don't think ...
George
--
George <jirka 5z com>
Although prepared for martyrdom, I preferred that it be postponed.
-- Sir Winston Churchill
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]