Re: vte [was Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers]
- From: Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas broadpark no>
- To: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin redhat com>
- Cc: Sven Herzberg <herzi gnome-de org>, luis villa gmail com, gnome-hackers gnome org, Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>, ross golder org, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: vte [was Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers]
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:57:13 +0100
man, 28,.02.2005 kl. 15.41 -0500, skrev Nalin Dahyabhai:
>On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:37:56AM -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:21:42 +0100, Sven Herzberg <herzi gnome-de org> wrote:
>> > I already asked Nalin about this, unfortunately I didn't get a reply from him.
>>
>> Anyone have a problem with Sven taking over? Speak up now or forever
>> hold your peace. (I know Kjartan tried long and hard to contact Nalin
>> as well with no success and eventually just started applying some
>> patches that made sense)
>
>Since you put it that way, I guess I'll speak up. I much prefer Mike's
>suggestion of forking, at least for the short-term. I do mean to get
>back to doing proper maintenance of the module.
>
I went ahead and commited the fedora patches today, and included a
couple of patches from bugzilla that other distros have been shipping
with for some time. Can we leave it at that for now and drop the fork?
I think we have a decent set of improvements over what was there in the
last release now and we can spend some time weeding out any issues
introduced by these patches and seeing to it that those are reported in
bugzilla etc.
There is one bugreport with patches that I think should be looked at
before 2.10:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137864
It would be very nice if we could ship with the patches in here included
as well. I got the impression Mandrake has already been using these.
I didn't want to just go ahead without a clear indication of approval,
but when I got no answer I felt something had to be done. I think that
this was something "the community" wanted to get some traction on too
and apologize if I've stepped over the line. Reverting back to where we
were is only a few clicks on URLs in bonsai away. :-)
Excerpt from ChangeLog with recent changes:
* src/dumpkeys.c: Fix build on NetBSD and Darwin.
Patch from Adrian Bunk <bunk at stusta de>. Closes
bug #126377 [http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126377]
* src/vteregex.h: Don't include <config.h> here. It breaks
building on AIX and can cause problems for l10n. Closes
bug #161352 [http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161352]
* src/keymap.c: (_vte_keymap_map): Fix keypad behaviour
to be like xterm. Closes bug #128099
[http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128099]. Fix is from
<jylefort at brutele be>.
* src/vte.c: (vte_terminal_visibility_notify): Fix black
backgrounds in new terminals. Fix from Jon Nettleton
<nettleton at gmail com>. Closes bug #125364
[http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125364]
* src/vte.c: (vte_terminal_adjust_adjustments),
(vte_terminal_maybe_scroll_to_bottom),
(vte_terminal_update_insert_delta), (vte_terminal_handle_scroll),
(vte_terminal_set_scroll_adjustment), (vte_terminal_size_allocate):
Apply patch from Fedora to fix some scrolling issues. Closes
bug #168210 [http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168210] and
possibly others
* src/iso2022.c: (_vte_iso2022_process): Apply another
patch from Fedora. This should fix some screen corruption
with multibyte charsets. Closes bug #168211
[http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168211]
* src/vte.c: (vte_terminal_scroll_region),
(vte_sequence_handler_al), (vte_sequence_handler_dl),
(vte_sequence_handler_sr), (vte_sequence_handler_insert_lines),
(vte_sequence_handler_delete_lines), (vte_terminal_handle_scroll):
Another patch from fedora. Make sure the screen is fully redrawn
before scrolling. Apparently this patch has some issues, but those
were found to be small enough to apply in Fedora, so I guess
the same holds true here.
* src/vte.c: (vte_terminal_unrealize): Fix a crash
when trying to use input methods. From Fedora.
Closes bug #168213 [http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168213]
* src/vte.c: (vte_terminal_scroll_region): Fix for
problem with redrawing when scrolling back then forward
Closes bug #122150 [http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122150].
Patch from Benjamin Otte.
* src/iso2022.c: (_vte_iso2022_is_ambiguous),
(_vte_iso2022_find_nextctl):
* src/uniwidths:
* src/vte.c: (vte_terminal_catch_child_exited), (vte_terminal_eof),
(vte_terminal_process_incoming), (vte_terminal_feed),
(vte_terminal_init), (vte_terminal_finalize), (vte_terminal_reset),
(add_display_timeout), (add_coalesce_timeout),
(remove_display_timeout), (remove_coalesce_timeout),
(vte_terminal_stop_processing), (vte_terminal_start_processing),
(vte_terminal_is_processing), (display_timeout),
(coalesce_timeout):
* src/vtexft.c: (_vte_xft_drawcharfontspec), (_vte_xft_draw_text):
Apply fix from Fedora package for performance problems. Closes
bug #143914 [http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143914]. Patch
was written by Søren Sandmann.
* src/vte.c: (vte_sequence_handler_send_primary_device_attributes):
Patch from Mariano to make vte claim to be the right type terminal.
Closes bug #130671 [http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130671].
I'll make a test tarball with these and the ones from
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137864 so we can get people
testing and possibly close out a few of the old bugzilla reports that
are relevant to these fixes.
Nalin, would it be ok with you if this was released as 0.11.12 and could
you find the time to review the patches in the report mentioned in the
paragraph above?
Cheers
Kjartan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]