Re: Subversion Migration: the importance of maturity.
- From: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- To: gnome-hackers gnome org
- Cc: Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>, James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>, Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>, Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>, Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>
- Subject: Re: Subversion Migration: the importance of maturity.
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:49:14 +1000
<quote who="Mark Galassi">
> I cought up on this thread late, but I would like to add an important
> consideration. It is worth taking a long, hard, penetrating look at the
> main developers of Arch. Look at their previous work. You will see
> projects where they showed some brilliant ideas and intuitions, but also
> many projects where "follow through" did not happen. I don't know how to
> put it any more politely than that, but I think that the point is
> important and I hope that we will not use Arch.
I don't think this is an issue, given that the only interesting branch of
'arch' these days is Bazaar, and there is an obvious roadmap in the form of
Bazaar-NG. Look at the people working on these projects, compare and
contrast.
- Jeff
--
OSCON 2005: August 1st-5th http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2005/
"Python amazes me for its concision. The current prototype is all of
900 lines of code, yet it contains a lexer, parser (recursive
descent), core language interpreter, and parallelizing process
spawner." - Raph Levien on Rebar
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]