Re: gtk+-1.2.10 should be in gnome-1.4 (was: Re: Final package deadline for GNOME 1.4)

[Karl Gaffney <Karl Gaffney Sun COM>]

If we make this change we're going to need a lot more time to properly
test that this change doesn't cause any gtk+ related regressions.

-Karl.

> Delivered-To: gnome-private-members@gnome.org
> Delivered-To: gnome-hackers@gnome.org
> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:12:52 +0200
> From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <gnome@listserv.bat.ru>
> To: Vlad Harchev <hvv@hippo.ru>
> Cc: gtk-devel-list@gnome.org, gnome-hackers@gnome.org, 
gnome-1.4-list@gnome.org, gnome-devel-list@gnome.org, 
gnome-1.4-release-team@gnome.org, gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: gtk+-1.2.10 should be in gnome-1.4 (was: Re: Final package 
deadline for GNOME 1.4)
> Mail-Followup-To: Timur I. Bakeyev <gnome@listserv.bat.ru>, Vlad Harchev 
<hvv@hippo.ru>, gtk-devel-list@gnome.org, gnome-hackers@gnome.org, 
gnome-1.4-list@gnome.org, gnome-devel-list@gnome.org, 
gnome-1.4-release-team@gnome.org, gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
> X-Organization: RIPE Network Coordination Centre
> X-Phone: +31 20 535 4444
> X-Fax: +31 20 535 4445
> X-WWW: http://www.ripe.net
> X-BeenThere: gnome-hackers@gnome.org
> X-Loop: gnome-hackers@gnome.org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5
> List-Id: <gnome-hackers.gnome.org>
> X-BeenThere: gnome-private-members@gnome.org
> X-Loop: gnome-private-members@gnome.org
> 
> Owen, I really hope, that this(release of gtk 1.2.10) will happen before
> Gnome 1.4 release date... 
> 
> I don't think that stepping back to 1.2.8 for Gnome is an option, but 
releasing
> Gnome with i18n broken 1.2.9 is much worse...
> 
> So, please, please - make a release :)
> 
> With regards,
> 	    Timur.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:57:53PM +0500, Vlad Harchev wrote:
> > 
> > On 27 Mar 2001, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> > 
> >  Hi, 
> > 
> >  I think gtk+-1.2.10 should be officially released before 1.4 deadline. As I
> > understand, gtk maintainers decided to release it (they even bumped minor
> > version number to 10 in configure.in) but gave up releasing it for some
> > reason. See http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/gtk%2b/ChangeLog for more info..
> > 
> >  I18n in gtk+-1.2.9 is totally broken - it doesn't allow cutting and pasting
> > any text that contains international characters (true at least for russian,
> > may be true for iso-8859-1 - didn't check it), and also another couple of 
i18n
> > problems. The fixes for these problems are in the CVS for a long time (about 
2
> > weeks).
> > 
> >  See the following threads:
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2001-March/msg00381.html
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2001-March/msg00379.html
> > 
> > 
> >  I think gnome-1.4 should contain gtk with all fixes - i.e. gtk+-1.2.10
> > should be released first, and then included in gnome-1.4.
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi everyone, 
> > > 
> > > This is a reminder that the final due date for tarballs for GNOME 1.4
> > > is this Wednesday, Mar 28, at 12:00 Pacific Time.
> > > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-hackers mailing list
> gnome-hackers@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-hackers
> 
>