Re: Two questions
- From: Yukihiro Nakai <ynakai redhat com>
- To: "R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog linuxhall org>
- Cc: lark linux net cn, gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Two questions
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 05:33:00 +0900
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 03:53:56 +0800 (HKT)
"R.I.P. Deaddog" <maddog@linuxhall.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Yukihiro Nakai wrote:
>
> > > I am the zh_CN translation coordinator. I have two questions:
> > >
> > > 1. Is it ok to convert all zh_CN translation (gb2312 encoding) to
> > > UTF-8? I mean for both GNOME 1.4.x and GNOME 2.x. I don't want to
> > > break anything.
> >
> > Hi, about Japanese team policy, .po is translated in
> >
> > GNOME 1.4 - ja_JP.eucJP (legacy locale)
> > GNOME 2.0 - ja_JP.UTF-8
>
> For Gnome 1.4.x, converting everything to UTF8 would break a lot of
> things. How it goes for Gnome 2.0 is unknown to me; anyone knows more on
> this matter?
We do not recommend GNOME 1.4.x with UTF8 locale,
and GNOME2 with UTF8 ja.po works fine here with 0.10.38.
> > > 2. Does positional argument (like %2$s %1$s) works for gtk+ 's printf
> > > function family? Positional arguments are very important for zh_CN.
> > > I always see warnings about positional arguments when running gnome
> > > applications.
> >
> > It doesn't work. Try to insert rows in Gnumeric in zh_CN and you'll see
> > gnumeric crashes.
> >
> > You should not use it until some fix-around commited in glib.
>
> For glib 1.2.x this seems to be a no-go, it's documented in glib source;
> anybody knows if it works for glib 1.3.x?
See this:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55106
I've no idea about glib 1.3.x.
--
Nakai
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]