Re: Bug #115289
- From: Abel Cheung <deaddog deaddog org>
- To: Christian Rose <menthos gnome org>
- Cc: Carlos =?utf-8?B?UGVyZWxsw7MgTWFyw61u?= <carlos gnome org>,Shaun McCance <shaunm wolfram com>,GNOME I18N List <gnome-i18n gnome org>,Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>,GNOME Release Team <release-team gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Bug #115289
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 21:20:05 +0800
On 2003-08-26(Tue) 12:49:55 +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
> > > Is the current situation a regression compared with our localization
> > > support in earlier GNOME releases?
> >
> > No, it's an improvement.
>
> And it's waaaay to late for "improvements" to GNOME 2.4.x code now.
> Let's all concentrate on making 2.5.x better instead.
I don't understand the "localization should not be improved" point. Your
argument is effectively preventing improvement for those teams who care.
For those teams who can't/won't update their tranlsations, they can live
without it. But now the freedom of choice is stripped off from every
team.
Abel
>
>
>
> Christian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n@gnome.org
> http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
--
Abel Cheung
Linux counter #256983 | http://counter.li.org
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) | http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1 41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF
PGP signature
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]