Re: Anjuta modules



On Wed, 2003-02-26 at 18:03, Christian Rose wrote:
> 
> so it seems unnecessary to include anjuta on the 2.2 pages. We should
> avoid redundant work and we shouldn't have translators spend time with
> something that is a dead end.
> 
Actually, anjuta is being ported to GNOME2 actively. The faq is little
old and has been updated. The gnome2 port of anjuta certainly requires
translation.

-- 
Regards,
-Naba




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]