[Bug 115177] Changed - Even more string issues



Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115177

Changed by aguelzow@taliesin.ca.

--- shadow/115177	Sun Jun 15 10:46:00 2003
+++ shadow/115177.tmp.7218	Sun Jun 15 15:38:52 2003
@@ -273,6 +273,13 @@
 the function prototype contradicts this. Maybe the two lines should say:
 
 "* If @known_x's and @new_x's is omitted, an array {1, 2, 3, ...} is
 used.\n"
 
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From aguelzow@taliesin.ca  2003-06-15 15:38 -------
+Regarding the latter remaining issue: you can have known_x's without 
+new_x's. I believe we used the notation [...] rather than [...[...]] 
+to mean that they are individually optional.
+
+I will need to check that.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]