Re: Another weekly translation status update (Sep 7--Sep 14)

[Danilo Segan <dsegan gmx net>]

уторак, 16. септембар 2003. 18:40:58 CEST — Åsmund Skjæveland написа:
> > Hi all,
> > Here's another translation update, this time much calmer than the
> > previous ones, and especially the last.
> 
> Is this for HEAD or for the 2.4 branches? It doesn't agree with
> http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gtp/status/gnome-2.4/top.html
> (As per 16. sept 2003, 16:37 UT).
>

Nope, it's
http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gtp/status/gnome-2.4/essential.html

This represents the "official" Gnome 2.4 desktop and developer  
platform, as explained at http://www.gnome.org/start/2.4 (find the  
"modules" page). This means that only "desktop" and "developer-libs"  
categories are counted toward the "status" in here.

I'm giving this list because it's hard to track status from
essential.html, because it's not sorted according to the most popular  
criteria of "supportedness".

> Also, this would be interesting to put on the GTP pages, in my
> opinion. It's also slightly easier to read than the graphical status  
> pages if a quick overview of how well your language is doing is what  
> you want (it takes a bit of reading and clicking, and as I say above,  
> the two lists don't agree).

Since this list is generated from essential.html, it's not a problem to  
also add this to GTP status pages. Though, I suspect the benefits of  
that. I'll provide you with a simple Perl script that processes  
essential.html and gives you such a list if you care about it.

Again, these are not the same list. Categories "extras", "office",  
"developer-apps" and "fifth-toe" are not taken into account.


Cheers,
Danilo