Re: GConf reverse string freeze breakage approval

[Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>]

It is really Danilo's and the i18n team's call. That said,
particularly on the horrendous misspelling, it would be nice if it
went in :)

Luis (who really thinks we should spell-check all .po files
automatically after every commit, and keeps waiting for someone to
give tinderbox the code to do that ;)

On 8/13/05, Adam Weinberger <adamw magnesium net> wrote:
> I jumped the gun and committed a string change without any approval
> whatsoever (except from the module maintainer). Danilo asked me to
> back out the change, and I'm perfectly willing to do so. But before
> I do, I wanted to see whether I can get the string change approved
> to remain in rather than backing it out.
> 
> The change is outlined in Bug #301133. It does two things: it changes
> an instance of "xml" to "XML", and changes "configurion" to
> "configuration". The changes are small enough that they shouldn't
> mess up any translator efforts, and they're important enough that it'd
> be really good to have them in 2.12 rather than shipping with
> misspellings.
> 
> I know that this is un-Kosher (and Danilo gave me a whipping; I've
> learned my lesson here), but I'd rather see these changes go into
> 2.12 than have to back them out.
> 
> # Adam
> 
> 
> --
> Adam Weinberger
> adamw magnesium net || adamw FreeBSD org
> adamw vectors cx    ||   adamw gnome org
> http://www.vectors.cx
> _______________________________________________
> release-team mailing list
> release-team gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
>