Re: Progress pages, doc/ui order
- From: danilo gnome org (Danilo Šegan)
- To: Matic Žgur <mr zgur gmail com>
- Cc: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Progress pages, doc/ui order
- Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:40:22 +0100
Hi Matic,
Today at 14:20, Matic Žgur wrote:
> I was just wondering about this Damned Lies application, is it
> considered stable, i.e. the data gets updated regularly, or is it better
> to use http://l10n-status.gnome.org/ ? As far as I can tell, this is a
> very promising and nice looking :) piece of software.
It gets updated regularly. I am adding some final touches right now,
and I hope to have default Gnome Translation status pages switch to
that along with 2006/2007 year switch :)
For most intents and purposes, you may use progress.gnome.org for your
daily translation work (though, it's updated only once a day, compared
to 3-a-day for l10n-status.g.o). Except listings of translation team
coordinators, which are quite out of date :)
Another important feature of progress.gnome.org is that it supports
SVN as well as CVS, so once GNOME finally switches to Subversion,
there'll be no other choice. :)
Cheers,
Danilo
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]