Re: New teams for Crimean Tatar (crh), Tatar in Turkey (tt_TR)
- From: "Reshat Sabiq (Reşat)" <tatar iqtelif i18n gmail com>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: New teams for Crimean Tatar (crh), Tatar in Turkey (tt_TR)
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:39:36 -1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Hm, could you please explain the differences between these two
> dialects/languages? I know some people from Crimea and when I
> asked they told me that there's no difference at all. That was
> loooong time ago, though.
>
Well, crh and tt are related languages (looking at ISO
classification), or dialects, but they are not the same. They are
mutually comprehensible, so in a sense they can be considered
dialects, but extent of mutual comprehensibility also depends on what
alphabet one uses, etc.
In general, tt_TR would be using 2 more characters in comparison to
crh, spelling is fairly frequently slightly different (though again
mutually comprehensible), some suffixes are different between the 2,
and vocabulary is different in some cases.
P.S. What you were probably told is that there is mutual
comprehensibility, not that there is no difference. There'd even be
less difference using Arabic alphabet in comparison to Latin alphabet,
but that's a historical alphabet at this time.
Thanks,
Reşat.
- --
My public GPG key is at:
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/export?id=476802195259949354
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE97mHBp3xEgSYgSoRAh7cAJ4kN+xt/E8l8qV7kvSTzzwcvYZscwCfTu8i
6W2nnrL3ETUIm6ow7rQdYf8=
=QcBS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]