Re: sr Latn vs sr latin

["Axel Hecht" <l10n moz googlemail com>]

I personally consider this a glibc bug. From the comments I read, it
seems that Danilo thinks so, too, but doesn't care enough to block on
it.

FWIW, if this would bubble up to Mozilla, I'd wontfix it. Not that I
see any likelyhood for something with '_' and '@' to do that, but
still, just as a datapoint.

Disclaimer, I don't have anything to say about or for Gnome, or
Serbian, though, someone who does should step up.

Axel

2008/4/17, Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Axel Hecht <l10n moz googlemail com> wrote:
>  > 2008/4/17, Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>:
>  >
>  >
>  > > glibc changed from @Latn to @latin some time ago.
>  >  >  Can we change the Gnome translations to go the same way ?
>  >  >
>  >  >  Using different locale labels in different parts of the OS is certainly
>  >  >  bad news for Serbian users, and I get bugs filed against GLib and GTK+
>  >  >  in Fedora to change to sr latin   
>  >
>  >  Is there a bug report or some other thing to see the original decision
>  >  on the glibc side?
>  >
>
>
> Here is some old mailing list discussion, if you enjoy that kind of thing:
>  http://www.cygwin.com/ml/libc-alpha/2003-09/msg00245.html
>
>  And here are some bugs that touch Latn vs latin:
>  http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38
>  http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=549
>
>  And some more:
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=426593,426585,442797,442799
>