Re: Anjuta is bad for translation for now



Hi!

Am Samstag, den 02.02.2008, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Ihar Hrachyshka:
> Just look what are the errors:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=507921#c7

Thanks for reporting. There are about 5 languages that nearly have 100%
without noticing all this. And please don't claim it's bad, it has more
than 1000 strings and only very few a bad.

Thanks,
Johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]