Re: Can we add avahi to d-l?
- From: Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Can we add avahi to d-l?
- Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:28:24 +0200
Le lundi 01 septembre 2008 à 21:41 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Disclaimer: I work for the Fedora Translation team too.
>
> Petr, I can't let you say that the current situation/Fedora sucks.
> Currently, Transifex instance on FP is a common infrastructure for
> various project, and the registration is open. So, although I agree that
> translation process should be set on the TP, as you've said before,
> we're talking about now and not the future. And now, the TP platform is
> not very practical for translators and for developers, as opposed to
> Transifex.
>
> So I think you have a problem with that situation because its a
> Fedora-branded server. If it was on the TP server, it would be the same
> situation : you'll have to register, sign some paper with your key and
> integrate a team. And this is not /downstream/, translation is sent to
> the upstream VCS, so all distro gets it.
Translations for cross-distro packages should *never* happen downstream,
be it Fedora, Ubuntu, OpenSuse, or whatever.
Point.
With a tool like Transifex, I understand there can be an abstraction
layer between the translation project and the real repository, but it's
currently not the case as the only Transifex instance is downstream.
Claude
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can we add avahi to d-l?
- From: =?UTF-8?Q?Sankarshan?= =?UTF-8?Q?_(=E0=A6=B8=E0=A6=99=E0=A7=8D?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=A6=95=E0=A6=B0=E0=A7=8D=E0=A6=B7=E0=A6=A3)?=
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]