Re: Something wrong with bug-buddy doc?
- From: Mario Blättermann <mariobl gnome org>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Something wrong with bug-buddy doc?
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:22:56 +0100
Am Sonntag, den 19.12.2010, 12:35 +0100 schrieb Jorge González González:
> Hi all,
>
> is there anything wrong with the bug buddy documentation?
> http://l10n.gnome.org/vertimus/bug-buddy/master/help/es
There is no really documentation. In the Git tree I found a manpage
only, and a naked manpage without any other stuff (appropriate
Makefile.am and OMF file) cannot be parsed by the gnome-doc-utils. As
far as I know, some explanations for bug-buddy are in the Desktop User
Manual.
Recently, there appeared some other manuals in the Damned Lies which
were also untranslatable yet. For gnome-pilot and genius I have added
g-d-u support immediately, and the meld manual shouldn't be translated
for the time being, after consulting the meld maintainer, because it is
outdated. A new build system for meld will be implemented anyway next
time, probably autotools or waf.
Why appears the non-existent manual of bug-buddy in D-L? No idea...
Could be that Vertimus parses the Git content regularly. But there's
nothing which resembles a DocBook or Mallard hierarchy. And I remember,
in the last years a similar bug-buddy manual appeared several times in
D-L and disappeared again some time later from it, also with zero
translatable strings. A bug in the parser routines of Vertimus?
Cheers,
Mario
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]