Re: Module reorganisation
- From: Petr Kovar <pmkovar gnome org>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Module reorganisation
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:05:20 +0100
Hi!
Mario Blättermann <mariobl gnome org>, Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:00:08 +0100:
(...)
> And as you mention the office module group, in my mind the modules
> "glabels" and "glom" should be part of it. I recognize them as office
> software, because their documentations are in the "office" section at
> library.gnome.org. And perhaps "passepartout". As a DTP application, it
> could be associated to office stuff, too. In fact, the "GNOME Office"
> doesn't exist really yet. It is not comparable with OpenOffice or
> Koffice. Well, Gnumeric and Dia are real killer apps, but I couldn't see
> a real collaboration between them. However, the office module set should
> be taken as a loose collection of office apps from our Git repo.
For what it's worth, GNOME Office has even its own Wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNOME_Office
And it states some interesting information like e.g. Glom and Evolution are
considered to be part of the suite. However, I guess that a more official
module list is on:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeOffice
As far as I know, a package called gnome-office is released periodically on
ftp.gnome.org. I don't know details though. Anybody here has a deeper
knowledge on the subject?
Too bad some of the suite modules aren't hosted on git.gnome.org (AbiWord),
so we can't translate them conveniently and have a consistent office suite
l10n.
Cheers,
Petr Kovar
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]