Re: Complaint of the Slovak coordinator

[Laco Gubík <lacogubik googlemail com>]

Hi Wouter,

Thanks for update. I would like to ask why is this discussed in private?

Johannes said that the new ML will be only for coordinators, so I
assume that you are discussing this there.
Does this also mean that Marcel, as Coordinator of Slovak team, is
discussing this with you and we are excluded?

I also agree that splitting team is not a good idea and we should try
to resolve this so we keep one team, but more productive and
relatively happy.

Thanks

Laco

On 17 May 2010 19:47, Wouter Bolsterlee <wbolster gnome org> wrote:
> Op maandag 17-05-2010 om 06:24 uur [tijdzone +0000], schreef
> jhs jsschmid de:
>> > So, to elaborate on your suggestion, the team would be split [...]
>> Sorry, splitting teams is a no-go in gnome-i18n policies. Be sure that the
>> coordination team is taking the whole thing very serious and will try the
>> best to resolve it but one of the first things we want is avoid splitting
>> teams.
>
> So far only Johannes and Petr (both i18n coordination team members) have
> publicly replied to this thread, but at this point I feel urged to share
> with you that other coordination team members (myself included) are also
> closely watching this discussion unfold. The coordination team is taking
> this very serious and is currently discussing the matter in a private
> thread.
>
> In the meantime: I totally agree with Johannes. Splitting teams is *not*
> an option. Generally speaking, forking open source projects does not
> work. Reasonable alternative options are currently under consideration
> in aforementioned private discussion.
>
>    — Wouter
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
>
>