Re: gnome-user-docs translations

[Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>]

Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 10:38 -0500, Shaun McCance a écrit :
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 16:08 +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 09:57 -0500, Shaun McCance a écrit :
> > > Hi folks,
> > > 
> > > gnome-user-docs isn't listed on l10n.gnome.org.
> > 
> > It is: http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gnome-user-docs/
> 
> So it is. But I don't see it linked from here:
> 
> http://l10n.gnome.org/module/

It is listed as GNOME 2 User Documentation.
 
> > It's a bit difficult to configure this currently in l10n.gnome.org, as
> > we have not a per-branch domain setting. Do you plan to keep the old
> > guides in the master branch? Or will you move them in the tree?
> 
> The old documents aren't in the build. The configure script
> only outputs a Makefile for gnome-help. But now that I think
> about it, my guess is that DL just greps Makefile.am files,
> without regard for configure.ac. (Blip does the same.)
> 
> I'll 'git rm' some files so they stop showing up in DL.

Thanks, it appears now correctly.

Le lundi 28 février 2011 à 16:58 +0100, Gabor Kelemen a écrit :
>Besides, it could be useful to keep them around for a while, for 
> example, a lot of accessibility-guide's content could be recycled
into 
> orca's help, perhaps some teams still had no time to do that.

They are still on gnome-2-x branches.

> Claude: perhaps we could simply register a new module with another
name 
> (gnome-help or something), using the same git module, and the new 
> document directory? Then the current g-u-d module can be left alone.

It works now with the current setup. When a docs directory does not
exist, D-L simply skip it.

Cheers,

Claude
-- 
www.2xlibre.net