On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 20:38 +0200, Mario Blättermann wrote: > Am 02.04.2012 17:37, schrieb Philip Withnall: > > On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 17:13 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote: > >> On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 14:33 +0000, GNOME Status Pages wrote: > >>> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: > >>> http://l10n.gnome.org. > >>> > >>> There have been following string additions to module 'libgdata.master': > >>> > >>> + "Error received from server after uploading a resumable upload chunk." > >> <pwithnall> libgdata master shouldn't be string frozen — it's unstable > >> <pwithnall> The latest stable release of libgdata is 0.10.x > >> <pwithnall> i.e. the libgdata-0-10 branch > > I've just branched libgdata for 0.12 (libgdata-0-12 branch) from just > > before I broke string freeze in master. > > > > Therefore, the latest stable release of libgdata is now 0.12.0. The > > libgdata-0-12 branch should be used for GNOME 3.4 translations, and > > master for GNOME 3.6. > > > > Philip > > > OK, I've assigned libgdata-0-12 to the GNOME 3.4 release set. But there > remain some untranslated strings for GNOME 3.0 and 3.2, because we have > the master branch still there. What to do here? Hmm. Based on a quick check of a few modules, the highest dependency for GNOME 3.2 was libgdata 0.9.1 (libgdata-0-10 branch) by gnome-documents. For GNOME 3.0 it was libgdata 0.7.0 (libgdata-0-8 branch) by EDS So I guess you could either change the branches on l10n.gnome.org to those; or you could change them both to libgdata-0-12 if you think it'll cause fewer strings to be marked fuzzy. Your call. Philip > Best Regards, > Mario
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part