Re: Survey on bug tracking of software translations.
- From: Olav Vitters <olav vitters nl>
- To: gnome-i18n gnome org
- Subject: Re: Survey on bug tracking of software translations.
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:44:41 +0100
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:11:11AM +0200, Rūdolfs Mazurs wrote:
> T , 2012-03-14 09:20 +0100, Olav Vitters rakstīja:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:59:03AM +0200, Rūdolfs Mazurs wrote:
> > > I have noticed that advanced translation bug tracking is too difficult
> > > to bother with in day to day use (at least for me) and I intend to
> > > simplify this process by making simplified and specialized bug tracker
> > > for translators. I was wondering, if other translators are having
> > > similar issues and if my work would be of use for community.
> >
> > I suggest just extending the existing infrastructure. E.g. by writing a
> > Bugzilla extension or enhancing Damned Lies (l10n.gnome.org). Within
> > GNOME we already have damned-lies and Bugzilla. Yet another tracker (and
> > thus account) isn't going to ease things.
> >
> Extending existing software or even better – finding an existing tracker
> that meets the requirements – is preferable. There are two issues I can
> foresee:
What I am saying is that within GNOME we already use Bugzilla and Damned
Lies. If those are lacking, then improve that. I don't see the value of
adding yet another site and expecting me (GNOME sysadmin) to host that.
The things you see as issues, I don't see how it relates to above.
--
Regards,
Olav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]