Re: GNOME Boxes string freeze break



Why not just create a gnome-3-6 branch before the commit in question and
proceed with development in master?
/Ihar

On 10/18/2012 05:17 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Hey everyone,
> 
> I've inadvertantly broken string freeze for GNOME Boxes with this commit:
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-boxes/commit/?id=c2e55a9b6c6fff11876716120e3f4e4f0889e4c6
> (only thought about the added strings after pushing).
> 
> The new strings added by this commit are not visible by the user during
> regular GNOME Boxes use, they will only appear when Boxes is run with
> --checks. Then GNOME Boxes runs some sanity checks and display some
> diagnosis information before exiting:
> 
> $ jhbuild run gnome-boxes --checks
> • Le processeur est capable de virtualisation : oui
> • Le module KVM est chargé : oui
> • L'invité KVM de Libvirt est disponible : oui
> • Boxes storage pool available: oui
> • SElinux est en mode par défaut : oui
> 
> Rapporter les bugs à
> <https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gnome-boxes>.
> Page d'accueil Boxes : <http://live.gnome.org/Boxes>.
> 
> 
> "Boxes storage pool available" is one of these new strings.
> Given that these strings only appear in some special debugging mode, I'd be
> tempted to say that this break is acceptable, but it's up to you to make
> the decision about what to do. Should I revert this commit and keep it for
> 3.7? Can I keep it as is? Should I do something else?
> 
> Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenience,
> 
> Christophe
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]