Re: WebKitGTK+ i18n
- From: Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress gmail com>
- To: Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net>
- Cc: gnome-i18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: WebKitGTK+ i18n
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:37:31 -0400
If your team is not using the vertimus workflow (or even if they are),
please post your completed PO file for WebKitGTK+ as an attachment to
a ticket in the webkit tracker.
https://bugs.webkit.org/
Thanks for your attention to this matter.
cjl
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Chris Leonard
<cjlhomeaddress gmail com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net> wrote:
>> I had to manually intervene on the server to update the SVN repo, but
>> now it seems to produce a correct POT file!
>>
>> I'd like to thank you Chris for your perseverance to solve this issue,
>> and also Martin Robinson for his contribution.
>
> I'd like to thank Claude and Martin as well for teaming up to work on
> this long overdue bugfix.
>
> I would like to make an appeal ot all language teams to work on
> completing the WebKitGTK+ PO files and submitting them via vertimus.
>
> http://l10n.gnome.org/module/webkit/
>
> There is a further step needed t oget them upstreamed (posting
> completed PO files as tickets on the webkit tracker, but having
> complete PO files is the first step.
>
> Although it is not tagged is such a way as to draw attention,
> WebKitGTK+ is very important to a fully localized Gnome web-browsing
> experience (i.e. Epiphany and Sugar Browse). I think we can all agree
> that a localized web-browser is essential.
>
> The following collection of tickets filed in the GNOME Bugzilla would
> suggest that Epiphany developers share the concern that I have about
> the current status of WebKitGTK+ L10n, and now we finally have a
> chance to close these!
>
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=610094%2C+610095%2C+610102%2C+610103%2C+610106%2C+610109%2C+610110%2C+610111%2C+610112%2C+610113%2C+610115%2C+610118%2C+610120%2C+610125%2C+610128%2C+610129%2C+610135%2C+610138%2C+610139%2C+610142%2C+610144%2C+610145%2C+610146%2C+610147%2C+610149%2C+610150%2C+610151%2C+610153%2C+610155%2C+610158%2C+610159%2C+610160%2C+610161%2C+610162%2C+610163%2C+610164%2C+610165
>
>
> Thank you for your attention to this matter.
>
> Warmest Regards,
>
> cjl
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]