Re: Gtk3 branch in Balsa

[Peter Bloomfield <peterbloomfield bellsouth net>]

On 10/01/2016 10:04:05 AM Sat, Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> Hi Claude:
>
> On 09/30/2016 05:21:49 PM Fri, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > Le 30. 09. 16 à 17:24, Piotr Drąg a écrit :
> > > 2016-09-30 12:29 GMT+02:00 Daniel Mustieles García <daniel mustieles gmail com>:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > We are monitoring the branch "Gtk3" for Balsa in DL, which has not movement
> > > > since 2012, and has problems generating doc statistics. It makes sense to
> > > > have this branch in DL?
> > > >
> > > > We also have linked this branck to the extra moduleset, instead of "master".
> > > > I think we should change this, removing the gtk3 branch and just monitoring
> > > > master branch.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think about this?
> > >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > gtk3 is actually the current development branch for balsa, as
> > > confirmed by the maintainer:
> > >
> > > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-i18n/2016-September/msg00041.html
> > >
> > > Hopefully, the docs problem will be fixed soon.
> >
> > Note that my answer in the above thread may not have reached Peter, as his provider is blocking my email 
> > domain.
> >
> > Claude
>
> Thanks for pointing that out! Somehow I missed your reply on the list, too :(
>
> I need to simplify Makefile.am to use explicit lists--shouldn't take long, when I get an hour or two.
>
> The other thing we need to do with Balsa is make a stable gtk2 branch and get development back into master. 
> We've been using the gtk3 branch for so long that I'm not looking forward to merging it back into master, but 
> it needs to be done...

The gtk3 branch has now been merged into master, and development will now continue in master. I've also 
changed Makefile.am to list HELP_FILES explicitly, which I hope will fix the statistics issue.

Thanks,

Peter

Attachment: pgpJlGr1F6gtd.pgp
Description: PGP signature