Re: [evolution] String freeze break plea for gnome-43 branch

[Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>]

        Hi,

On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 12:30 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> For my fellow i18n coordinator who will try to assess the situation
> like I just did: the link is to an issue that’s closed. It links to a
> related MR, which has been merged a while ago and is not what Milan
> is trying to get approved here. The issues is closed via a commit
> that contains the actual strings. I supposed that commit was on the
> main branch and Milan is asking for approval to backport.

Err, right, my fault, I should rather link the commit itself, than its
corresponding bug report.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/commit/c12bb7fa4380a28992fb99ad9e7173305b5065bc
The bug had been closed by that commit ~ an hour ago.

> I suppose the other new strings about icon size in the commit are not
> going to be backported.

I thought of using both options, to have 1:1 correspondence of the
change between the stable and the development branch, but yes, I can
skip it.

> The second string feels a bit weird. In “and uses it”, what does the
> “it” refer to? I suggest rephrasing this, e.g. "When enabled, adds
> buttons to the header bar. This applies to dialogs as well. Changing
> the option requires application restart."

You deciphered it right, the 'it' is as 'the option'. I just changed it
to your string:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/commit/96bdef5a015f9c1bd9736333943eaae11dc1b542

> From a pure i18n perspective, the request is reasonable and here is
> approval 1/2. Please add the strings ASAP once you get the second
> approval, so translators get as much time as possible before the .1
> release.

Sure thing. Thank you.

        Bye,
        Milan