Re: GNOME & KOM/OP
- From: "Anders W. Tell" <anderst toolsmiths se>
- CC: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GNOME & KOM/OP
- Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1998 02:44:02 +0200
Todd Graham Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, Phil Dawes wrote:
>
> > The books I have read on COM have had nothing bad to say about it,
> > but then they haven't been comparing it with other established systems.
> > There *are* flaws in COM, however there are also workarounds and these
> (...)
>
> Can we _PLEASE_ stop referring to COM here? Miguel has (I think) made
> it clear that COM will not be used anywhere in GNOME. It's going to
> be an OLE-like model over CORBA. No COM to be found.
>
> OLE is not COM. If you mean OLE, then say OLE, not COM!
Finally someone that sees the difference between a Component technology and the
use of it !
>
>
>
> I'm not knowledgeable enough to particpate in the larger debate, but
> _PLEASE_ stop implying that the forthcoming component model is in any
> way COM-based. It make my ears hurt! Elliot et al. wrote ORBit for a
> reason, darn it!
>
> --
> Todd Graham Lewis (800) 719-4664, x2804
> ******Linux****** MindSpring Enterprises tlewis@mindspring.net
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-components-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]