imlib and libpng [was: gnome-libs + Debian = chokes!]
- From: Erik Andersen <andersen inconnect com>
- To: Tomas Ogren <stric ing umu se>
- cc: gnome-list <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: imlib and libpng [was: gnome-libs + Debian = chokes!]
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 09:56:43 -0700 (MST)
On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Tomas Ogren wrote:
> On 07 December, 1998 - Erik Andersen sent me these 0.9K bytes:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Hawlisch Martin wrote:
> >
> > > I'm using Debian too, but I don't use the packages because I ran into
> > > version problems too. I'm now using all the stuff (glib, gtk+,
> > > gtk-engines, imlib, audiofile, esound, ORBit, gnome-libs, ...) from CVS.
> > > Works fine.
> > >
> >
> > I started down that path, but imlib won't compile with libpng 1.0.2.
> > For some strange reason it wants 1.0.1, which is not available at the
> > upstream site. I checked at ftp.redhat.com, and I only saw linpng 1.0.2,
> > which is what Debian has. I have no idea how to get the right lib source,
> > so it won't build.
>
> IIRC, libpng 1.0.2 has a totally broken alpha-implementation.. Sources
> can be found at ftp.cdrom.com/pub/png/src/
>
> They have both 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 (guess why...)
>
> /Tomas
Thanks for the info. I'll grab it there.
Seems like if libpng has a problem with its alpha code, then the
Right Thing(tm) would be to fix libpng, not revert to an old release.
That would ensure that everyone knows about the problem and deals with
it by upgrading. Is the upstream libpng maintainer missing, or unwilling
to fix the problem?
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen Web: http://www.inconnect.com/~andersen/
email: andersee@debian.org
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]