Re: gnome
- From: "Brandon S. Allbery" <allbery hilfy ece cmu edu>
- To: Jimen Ching <jching flex com>
- cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome
- Date: Wed, 09 Dec 1998 08:27:28 -0500
In message <Pine.BSI.4.02A.9812082018150.5497-100000@flex.com>, Jimen Ching wri
tes:
+-----
| I'm getting the feeling that all of the people who responded to my mail
| either didn't read what I wrote or didn't understand. In either case, it
| is very hard to continue the discussion.
+--->8
We understood fine. What *you* don't seem to understand is that we don't have
realistic microkernels everywhere, or even kernels that support loadable
modules everywhere. Fantasize all you want, but don't propose it if it isn't
viable.
| Everyone is worried about all of the systems
| out there that doesn't support this kernel feature. Why not worry about
| getting a good design and a functional environment before we worry about
| these systems?
+--->8
"Let them eat cake."
--
brandon s. allbery [os/2][linux][solaris][japh] allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering KF8NH
carnegie mellon university ["God, root, what is difference?" -Pitr]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]