Re: GNOME GTK-- Projects
- From: Erik Andersen <andersen inconnect com>
- To: gnome-list <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME GTK-- Projects
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 23:51:49 -0600
On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 08:30:33PM +0000, Michael Hudson wrote:
>
> Did you read my post?
> If not why did you quote it?
> Unless you compile GTK+ in C++, there's no guarantee that exceptions will
> be able to propgate through the GTK+ code.
Sorry about not directly responding. I guess I got so excited with
quickly designing a Gtk+ interface for configurable error handling, I forgot
to reply to the issue at hand.
You are correct and this is something I had not given a great deal of thought
to. This can be handled though. See:
http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs-bugs/1998-Apr/0483.html
and the follow-up post:
http://www.cygnus.com/ml/egcs-bugs/1998-Apr/0490.html
from the egcs mailing list on the subject. If Gtk+ is compiled with
"gcc -fexceptions" (or is compiled with a C++ compiler) all should be well.
Even if folks think that compiling Gtk+ with a C++ compiler is evil, perhaps
not too many folks will have heartburn over "gcc -fexceptions"??? I don't
know if Gtk+ requires gcc (pgcc, egcs, etc...) or not at this point, but
this feature would probably require that though... :-(
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen Web: http://www.inconnect.com/~andersen/
email: andersee@debian.org
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]