Re: Question about programming techniques
- From: Miroslav Silovic <silovic zesoi fer hr>
- To: Tero Pulkkinen <terop students cc tut fi>
- Cc: "Andrew V. Shuvalov" <andrew ecsl cs sunysb edu>, Dirk Luetjens <dirk Elfe lfm RWTH-Aachen DE>, "gnome-list gnome org" <gnome-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Question about programming techniques
- Date: 27 Jun 1998 03:05:54 +0200
Tero Pulkkinen <terop@students.cc.tut.fi> writes:
> Miroslav Silovic <silovic@zesoi.fer.hr> writes:
> > Excuse me... what 'power'? Aside from the fact that MICO owes much of
> > its uselessness to STL, you elegantly avoided Dirk's simple question;
> > and the answer to it is: You can't.
>
> What were the problems with mico?
Gcc bloats to >100MB while expanding templates MICO generates. The
resulting lib is larger than most apps using it.
Of course, MICO is badly-written: it links in a largish part of STL.
Still, I'd think that STL should be usable to its full power to be
useful - rather than useful only if you limit yourself to its small
subset.
Miro
--
I refuse to use .sig
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]