Re: gnome developer docs - not sgml
- From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik pobox com>
- To: atownley informix com (Andrew S. Townley)
- Cc: jgarzik pobox com, luther dpt-info u-strasbg fr, miguel nuclecu unam mx, Newcombe mordor clayton edu, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gnome developer docs - not sgml
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 10:47:16 -0500 (EST)
Andrew S. Townley wrote:
> I have also done this. I had to hand-hack nearly every libtool script so it
> could find the ltmain.sh script. That was the only problem related to tools
> that I had.
Ditto. There were a bunch of little problems that required manual
intervention, and libgtop was totally broken. I'm working on gnome-core
right now. :)
Jeff
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >luther@maxime.u-strasbg.fr wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 05:18:32PM -0600, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> >> > > The next, and hardest part is finding all the gnu stuff which everyone
> >> > > else uses, such as autogen/autoconf, m4, and all of the libraries which
> >> > > comes with most Linux distributions (ie libtiff, libjpeg...)
> >
> >> > Autoconf/Automake/LIbtool are only required if you use the CVS source
> >> > code. If you use the released tarballs you dont need those.
> >
> >> False, the libtool things were broken in gnome-libs 0.30 and 0.30.1 without GNU
> >> libtool ...
> >
> >heh, I just built 0.30.1 on Solaris w/o auto* and libtool.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> > To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> > "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
> >
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]