Re: `cvs' version problem? (was Re: CVS compilation problems...)

[Raja R Harinath <harinath cs umn edu>]

John R Sheets <dusk@smsi-roman.com> writes:
> John R Sheets wrote:
> > Raja R Harinath wrote:
> > > Anything that puts one or more of macros/, intl/, or libvfs/ at the same
> > > level as gnome-libs is wrong.
> >
> > I'm running cvs 1.9 from rpm, and I've noticed that it seems to act a little
> > inconsistent about which level it tries to put macros/ etc in, depending on
> > which module I'm checking out, even with a fresh checkout.  If I recall
> > properly, cvs put macros/ in the right place for ee, but not for gnome-libs,
> > gnome-network, and maybe a couple other packages.
> 
> I upgraded to CVS 1.10 and tried checking out ezpaint into a fresh directory,
> like this:
> 
> > mkdir tmpcvs
> > cd tmpcvs/
> > cvs -z3 checkout ezpaint
> 
> The directory listing was like this:
> 
> > ls
> ezpaint/ macros/ intl/
> 
> So, it's still not working...  Hmmmmm.

There are four CVS servers serving out AnonCVS.  We'll have to figure
out which one is acting funny.

- Hari
-- 
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu
"When all else fails, read the instructions."      -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing."   -- Roy L Ash