Re: Windows and DLLs
- From: Alan Shutko <ats acm org>
- To: David Jeske <jeske home chat net>
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Windows and DLLs
- Date: 01 Oct 1998 13:58:13 -0500
>>>>> "D" == David Jeske <jeske@home.chat.net> writes:
D> 1) a user wants to use an app which only works with a newer
D> lib. (i.e. he can't install it easily unless he's administrator, or
D> a unix wizard)
He throws it in a directory somewhere and sets his LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
D> 2) a newer micro version of a lib fixes a bug which caused problems
D> with some app, but the fix causes problems with another app.
He writes a wrapper around the broken app which sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
D> The only reason UNIX dosn't currently suffer the same kind of lib
D> hell as windows is that there arn't very many apps/libs
D> available. It's not because the UNIX system is that much better.
What do you mean by "lots of apps/libs"? Do you need thousands? Unix
has thousands.
--
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - By consent of the corrupted
Truth is free, but information costs.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]