Re: Problem with anoncvs? glib and gnome-xml are weird
- From: Havoc Pennington <rhpennin midway uchicago edu>
- To: Daniel Veillard <Daniel Veillard w3 org>
- cc: "Brandon S. Allbery" <allbery ece cmu edu>, gnome-list gnome org, lm bitmover com
- Subject: Re: Problem with anoncvs? glib and gnome-xml are weird
- Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 14:33:51 -0500 (CDT)
On Sat, 17 Oct 1998, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
> BTW, with the large number of independant packages/maintainers, I think
> that Gnome would be a perfect testbed for Larry Mc Voy source management
> framework BitKeeper [1].
BitKeeper is non-free for now, so we shouldn't use it. (Larry, not a
flame; I support your license 100%, it just isn't appropriate for Gnome
IMHO, since Gnome is a GNU project.)
No flame wars please, I'm just trying to head off pointless discussion of
moving to BitKeeper. It would be hypocritical for a GNU project to require
non-free software in order to participate in it.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]