Imlib patch: for the ipc/XShm impaired

["Gary V. Vaughan" <gvaughan oranda demon co uk>]

Since it is only a small patch... I have attached it here.

If this is an acceptable patch, I will clean up my Fnlib and E ports
too.

raster@redhat.com wrote:
> 
> On 25 Sep, Gary V. Vaughan shouted:
> ->  In order to support those pathetic machines without ipc, shared
> ->  memory and the XShm extension (like mine!); would a patch to add
> ->  configuration options to preprocess away the code that relies on
> ->  this stuff (modelled after the way that gtk+ does it) be
> ->  desirable?
> ->
> ->  I have a quick'n'dirty version hacked into some recent snapshots
> ->  so that I can run Fnlib, Imlib and E on my machine... If you
> ->  would be receptive to patches, I will clean them up and post???
> 
> what? peope without SYSV IPC? what kind of b0rken os's are they?

I must confess to running on M$ NT4SP3 =(O|  But before you all lynch
me, I am working my way through the tower of libraries needed to get
gnome & E working under win32.  Is there an interest in rolling any/all
of this back into the development tree?  Alternatively, does anyone want
to host a complete set of win32 patches (or at least those I can't
persuade the respective package developers to accept) for E and gnome?

> ok.. I'll relent to accepting patches IF and ONYL IF (IFF) they are
> clean, neat tidy and nto a quick hack-em-up and they dont break shmem
> use  for the 99.9% of people who do have shmem. :)

I also have dll safe versions of glib-1.1.3 and gtk-1.1.2+themes based
on Craig Setera's gtk+ for win32, so that gdk_imlib and config
directories can be compiled.  [You want these Michael -- they build alot
cleaner than the dlls I sent before?]

Cheers,
	Gary V. Vaughan

imlib.diff.gz