Re: What is xpm.h



At 3:37 PM -0700 on 4/9/99, Spud wrote:
>
>
>        No, i don't think so, because Xpm is pretty much standard if you
>have Xfree86. That would be like putting the following dependencies on the
>GNOME installation page:
>ls
>gcc
>libc
>
>Etc...you get my point. Some things are taken for granted.

Hmm,

It's apparently not standard in the latest XFree86 and X packages for 
RH 5.2. I did have xpm-3.4j-3 installed, but that did not contain the 
file in question -- I searched my entire file system. 
XFree86-devel-3.3.3.1-1.1 did not provide it either.

I would have agreed with your point were the header file present on 
my system -- the library was, but the header file was not...

Cheers, igor



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]