Re: Window managers
- From: James Henstridge <james daa com au>
- To: Richard Hult <rhult hem2 passagen se>
- cc: Paul Warren <pdw ferret lmh ox ac uk>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Window managers
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 22:00:55 +0800 (WST)
RPM does contain the requires A or B type dependencies. Packages A and B
would have to provide a virtual package (say gnome-compliant-wm), and then
gnome would require the virtual package.
James.
--
Email: james@daa.com.au
WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/
On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Richard Hult wrote:
>
> > > RedHat has chosen to do it this way, to make sure that the user always
> > > have at least one gnome-compliant window manager. There has been variuos
> > > discussions here on this matter.
> >
> > Yes, I can see the reasoning behind this. RPM doesn't have a requires "A
> > or B" feature does it? If not, another way to do it is to have the
> > installation for both Window Manager and E (they're both part of the
> > RedHat distro) touch a file, and then the Gnome installation checks for
>
> Yes, I agree with you. That's a good idea, and that came up the last time
> this issue was discussed. I don't remember exactly what happened, but it
> seems as the idea wasn't picked up, unfortunately.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]