Re: GTK version
- From: Raja R Harinath <harinath cs umn edu>
- To: Gleef <dzol virtual-yellow com>
- Cc: zipper <likenux usa net>, gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GTK version
- Date: 06 Jan 1999 12:11:03 -0600
Gleef <dzol@virtual-yellow.com> writes:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, zipper wrote:
> > To all,
> >
> > get the latest CVS gtk+
> >
> > the changelog said is version 1.1.12
> > but when compile, it gimme 1.1.11
> >
> > somebody forgot the change the version no ?
>
> Same thing with me. The docs say 1.1.12, the gtk-config says 1.1.12, the
> library gets installed as 1.1.11, and libgtop's configure script detects
> it as 1.1.11. Whazzup?
Nothing. Things are working fine. Look closely: you'll find that the
new library has a newer micro version. This is a way of saying GTK+
1.1.12 is binary compatible with GTK+ 1.1.11, all external interfaces
are the same.
To repeat what has been repeated many times all over: the library
major version has little to do with the version of the package it
comes from.
The library versioning used in gtk+ and glib is an attempt to try to
reflect the package version in a slightly more organized way. For
package version x.y.z, the library soname will look like
libfoo-x.y.so.z'.u.w
where z' is in less than or bounded by z.
- Hari
--
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu
"When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]