Re: gtk+ and gtk-engines slow
- From: mozart windsor igs net
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gtk+ and gtk-engines slow
- Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 17:52:49 -0500 (EST)
Ever try the program imlib_config ? it works great, and what a bonus, a
pretty interface, yay! :)
On 23-Jan-99 Marcus Brubaker wrote:
> I'm probably sticking my nose where it doesn't belong (it wouldn't be
> the
> first time) but it's a shame to see the both of you, both exceptional
> programmers that are obviously quite stubborn, fueding about something
> like this. I'm inclined to side with raster in that hosing the cache
> arbitrarily in such a way is a bad idea, but the happy medium is to set
> a
> *default* in a config file to turn Imlib caching on or off. I think
> defaulting it to on is a good idea and then those 486 users that can't
> handle the cache can turn it off by hand until someone writes a capplet
> (or modifies one) to do it in a pretty interface. Lets stop bickering
> and
> just get back to what we all love to do, hacking. :)
>
> On Sat, 23 Jan 1999 raster@redhat.com wrote:
>
>> On 23 Jan, Miguel de Icaza scribbled:
>> ->
>> -> > The solution is to leave caching on. miguel wanted it off by
>> default.
>> -> > All my code I write for Imlib ASSUMES caching - its SO HANDY it
>> means
>> -> > having to write very little intelligent code since all the smarts
>> are
>> -> > handled for me. imlib is a high-level Image loading and display
>> library
>> -> > - not low level. :)
>> ->
>> -> In GNOME we do not assume that. So, that logic that might make
>> sense
>> -> in Englightment is turned off for us.
>> ->
>> -> See my previous post for a solution in the case of the gtk-engines
>> setup.
>>
>> I have reasons for caching - I designed the cache etc. for a very god
>> reasona nd I make use of it in my code. App slike electic Eyes, E,
>> gtk-pixmap theme etc. rely on it for performance reasons. overriding
>> user preferences forcibly in gnome-libs is the most evil thing i've
>> ever
>> seen. all performance issues wiht imlib and gnome hencefore I will deny
>> any responsability for. This is all on your head, not mine. I disagre
>> with you on this and I have my reasons. I will let you bog gnome down
>> if
>> you want.
>>
>> -> Miguel.
>> ->
>> ->
>>
>> --
>> --------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am"
>> --------------------
>> raster@rasterman.com /\___ /\ ___/||\___ ____/|/\___
>> raster@redhat.com
>> Carsten Haitzler | _ //__\\ __||_ __\\ ___|| _ / Red Hat
>> Advanced
>> 218/21 Conner Drive || // __ \\_ \ | | \ _/_|| / Development
>> Labs
>> Chapel Hill NC 27514 USA ||\\\/ \//__/ |_| /___/||\\ 919 547
>> 0012 ext 282
>> +1 (919) 929 9443, 801 4392 For pure Enlightenment
>> http://www.rasterman.com/
>>
>> \|/ ____ \|/ For those of you unaware. This face here is
>> in fact
>> "@'/ ,. \@" a Linux Kernel Error Message.
>> /_| \__/ |_\
>> \__U_/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at
>> http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
>> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
>> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
>>
>
> Marcus Brubaker
> spoon@elpaso.net
> http://www.elpaso.net/~spoon
>
> Distrust all men in whom the impulse to punish is powerful.
> -Nietzsche
>
>
>
> --
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail gnome-list-request@gnome.org with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: mozart@windsor.igs.net
Date: 23-Jan-99
Time: 17:52:01
This message was sent by XFMail
----------------------------------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]