Re: Updated RH 6.0 GNOME RPMS 6/1
- From: onderste casema net
- To: Miguel de Icaza <miguel nuclecu unam mx>
- Cc: dkelson inconnect com, gnome-list gnome org, gnome-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Updated RH 6.0 GNOME RPMS 6/1
- Date: Thu, 3 Jun 1999 13:56:45 +0200
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 09:50:00AM -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
Hi Miguel and all others,
> I need people running RH6 to test the new gnome-libs rpms that Dax
> did. Elliot says that it became binary incompatible with the
> gnome-libs 1.0, and this is something we should make sure does not
> happen.
>
> Do I need people who are running RH6 to install the gnome-libs
> packages from:
>
> ftp://ftp.inconnect.com/pub/unix/linux/redhat-6.0/contrib-updates/
>
> And tell me if their GNOME system is fully operational after the
> upgrade.
Well, just upgraded (rpm -Uvvh *rpm) with the above-mentioned RPMS on my
2-days new RH6.0, it seems to be doing fine, I did recompile the 2.2.9 kernel
after that (and applied the DoS-bugfix), and now -after being away for half
an hour- there was this kernel-message waiting for me :
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 7ecc0d62
current->tss.cr3 = 0146c000, %cr3 = 0146c000
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[<c01ca279>]
EFLAGS: 00010a12
eax: 7ecc0d5e ebx: 00000000 ecx: 0ac0b7b9 edx: 2b02dee4
esi: 7ecc0d5e edi: c05f7ef0 ebp: c05f7ef0 esp: c05f7e9c
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Process fadeplot (pid: 720, process nr: 48, stackpage=c05f7000)
Stack: 00000000 c05f7fb4 c05f7eec c05f7edc c05f7ed8 00000000 c05f7ec4 c05f7ee4
7ecc0d5e 40844e57 95f701da af5374eb c05f7fb4 00000000 00000000 51d58e47
169bcefd 3852032f c4606cb8 1d314b67 7813350f 1925cc19 349a6617 c645d522
Call Trace: [<c01c6b6f>] [<c01c82c2>] [<c01c4149>] [<c0118987>]
[<c0107bb3>] [<c0107af0>]
Code: f7 60 04 89 54 24 28 8b 54 24 5c 89 54 24 10 89 54 24 2c 89
when I switched to X there was screensaver waiting with the
password-popupbox, after filling in the passwd and pressing enter I went to
the controlcenter, and controlcenter's radiobutton's claimed that there was
no passwd needed for screensaver.
I'm using Redhat 6.0 (Hedwig) on a K6 II 333 Mhz, 32 MB RAM, it's not
overclocked, not using APM, Powerstuff is disabled in the BIOS,
I enabled shadow and md5 passwd-stuff at the installation.
So, what's up ?
--
gr o e tjes, Albert.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]