Re: Did GNOME go 1.0 too early?
- From: mawarkus t-online de (Matthias Warkus)
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Did GNOME go 1.0 too early?
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 14:36:39 +0100
+++ Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 08:27:02AM +0100 +++
Nils Jeppe e-mails me. Film at 11. Reply right now, after the break.
> I don't know about ORBit/Mico. Anyway. KDE's imlib and esound equivalents
> are in, I think, kdesupport. The advantage is you really don't need a
> zillion packages to install KDE.
[schnibble]
> there is kdecore. control-center is included in the kdecore, as are a
> windowm manager and kfm (the gmc equivalent). Then again, kde has been
> around longer, so it's natural that they have a lead.
This is not a lead; I consider it a significant feature that Gnome is
packaged in a finer-grained way.
Thus, there is less unnecessary downloading for updates.
mawa
--
Everybody lies about sex. IT'S IN THE MANUAL.
-- unintentional juxtaposition in George Lin's follow-up of Adam
Hill's posting. RTFM before fibbing, I guess.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]