Re: 1.0 tarball compile problem
- From: Nils Jeppe <nils providence work de>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: 1.0 tarball compile problem
- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:44:39 +0100 (MET)
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 jlh@geodesic.com wrote:
> What I just did, (and it worked), was to install each of [libz, libtiff, libpng,
> libungif]
> from the RPMS on the RedHat 5.2 binary install cd. This installs the libraries into
> /usr/lib. After running 'ldconfig -v', and rerunning ./configure in the imlib-1.9.4
> directory, imlib built just fine, with no complaints.
If all else fails I guess I'll have to try this. But there must be a way
for imlib to find these files - If they then prove to be outdated, I'll
compile new ones... Fine. But this is just annoying :)
> I still don't understand it, but it is yet another example of the confusion that can
> result, in both programmers and the OS, from using both RPMS and tarball
> installs. And I hope somebody fixes it, because I do want to be able to build
> any libraries from sources.
Yeah, same here... In my experience, self-built programs are much neater
than prefab rpms :)
----
"When one entertains female friends, one should try not to
look quite as seedy as certain unnamed parties habitually do."
--- Calvin & Hobbes: "It's a Magical World"
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]