Re: My first impression and goodbye
- From: "James M. Cape" <jcape jcinteractive com>
- To: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: My first impression and goodbye
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 06:49:24 +0000
Gerald Gutierrez wrote:
>
> > If they're "Use at your own risk", why are they "required to run Gnome"?
> > If they're still in development, why is gmc at version 4.5.23 and
> > control-center at version 1.0.1?
>
> This seems to be a trend in modern software society. A new major version
> used to signify a prime time debugged and and ready-for-use piece of
> software that people will get. Many have taken the inverse of
> this argument, instead of the converse, to be true. So now it means "if I
> increase the major version number people will come and use my software".
> So now we have software that's not ready for general use getting
> ++major_version_number.
As I said, I was unaware the control-center was in a 1.0.x release. And
as I also said, GMC's versioning is based on the underlying MC's
version, and MC was around for a long time before Gnome.
> > No, you told him to post error messages, backtraces, etc. and that his
> > concerns were just "incongruous bitching". Denigrating problem reports
> > is no way to build a userbase.
>
> This was discussed recently in another mailing list. The major point that
> came out was:
>
> "Netiquette" came from "Etiquette".
Sigh... I wasn't denegrating problem reports because there weren't any:
Gmc core dumps. Ok, what were you doing when it core dumped. What does
gdb say? What is the exact version you installed? Did you compile it or
use a deb/rpm?
If you are going to report a problem, report enough details to help,
don't just say "it dies on me".
> >> And nearly all the problems he
> >> encountered aren't Gnome-core or Gnome-libs related. Most were E and
> >> Gmc, neither of which are finished yet.
> > But which, again, are required to run Gnome 1.0 (or so the web site
> > leads one to believe)
>
> Sounds like E and Gmc are part of GNOME to me.
>
> "No the wheels aren't part of the car, but you need them to drive."
I used Window Maker with Gnome for weeks until I switched to E. So, E is
most certainly *not* required to use Gnome. While using Gnome and Window
Maker, I also declined to run Gmc because I didn't want desktop icons.
So no, Gmc isn't required either. They tell you to install them because
it's easier to get around with a radio and a dashboard clock than not.
Can you go the other route? Of course. It's just that the E/Gmc route is
the recommended one.
Jim Cape
http://www.jcinteractive.com
"All animals are equal, some animals
are more equal than others."
-- George Orwell, Animal Farm
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]